Hopefully! If nothing else, it's great to have an upper cap on what local ISPs can maximally charge and minimally provide in terms of bandwidth.
But something tells me that it won't universally receive a license. At least some government-owned or incumbent ISPs will probably succeed in lobbying the government to protect their investments in some way, for better or worse.
For example, Saint Helena (which is extremely remote and until recently had only geostationary-based slow internet connections with low data caps) doesn't allow Starlink, apparently because the government has invested a lot in a new fiber project and wants to recoup that cost at least partially from ISP subscriptions rather than people switching to Starlink.
But something tells me that it won't universally receive a license. At least some government-owned or incumbent ISPs will probably succeed in lobbying the government to protect their investments in some way, for better or worse.
For example, Saint Helena (which is extremely remote and until recently had only geostationary-based slow internet connections with low data caps) doesn't allow Starlink, apparently because the government has invested a lot in a new fiber project and wants to recoup that cost at least partially from ISP subscriptions rather than people switching to Starlink.