> Have empathy for the people that need to see it in action.
With the full context of my comment, I feel that I've given sufficient empathy for people who aren't me.
> I mean, I sort of get it. Perhaps, deep down, everyone is easy to amuse; it's just a question of what domain are they easily amused by.
Is this not an allowance?
> Also, you know, it's fun. Don't ruin it for others because you can't/won't/don't
I hope I wasn't ruining anyone's fun by being unable to properly comprehend how they choose to have it and verbalizing that incomprehension. Although, if speaking with uncertainty about a topic is enough to ruin someone's fun, then I feel I should note that I find fun in making overly wordy comments about how I don't understand other people. I implore you not to ruin my fun because you can't/won't/don't.
Although, I suspect my fun has never wrecked an internal wiki. I'll leave it to historians to judge between my fun and theirs.
With the full context of my comment, I feel that I've given sufficient empathy for people who aren't me.
> I mean, I sort of get it. Perhaps, deep down, everyone is easy to amuse; it's just a question of what domain are they easily amused by.
Is this not an allowance?
> Also, you know, it's fun. Don't ruin it for others because you can't/won't/don't
I hope I wasn't ruining anyone's fun by being unable to properly comprehend how they choose to have it and verbalizing that incomprehension. Although, if speaking with uncertainty about a topic is enough to ruin someone's fun, then I feel I should note that I find fun in making overly wordy comments about how I don't understand other people. I implore you not to ruin my fun because you can't/won't/don't.
Although, I suspect my fun has never wrecked an internal wiki. I'll leave it to historians to judge between my fun and theirs.