Why not? Some people can "Yeah, I get it. Very Clever." just from the description. Some people CAN'T. The proof of this is in math class where people struggle with word problems. You are in the category of people that get it from description only. Have empathy for the people that need to see it in action.
Also, you know, it's fun. Don't ruin it for others because you can't/won't/don't
> Have empathy for the people that need to see it in action.
With the full context of my comment, I feel that I've given sufficient empathy for people who aren't me.
> I mean, I sort of get it. Perhaps, deep down, everyone is easy to amuse; it's just a question of what domain are they easily amused by.
Is this not an allowance?
> Also, you know, it's fun. Don't ruin it for others because you can't/won't/don't
I hope I wasn't ruining anyone's fun by being unable to properly comprehend how they choose to have it and verbalizing that incomprehension. Although, if speaking with uncertainty about a topic is enough to ruin someone's fun, then I feel I should note that I find fun in making overly wordy comments about how I don't understand other people. I implore you not to ruin my fun because you can't/won't/don't.
Although, I suspect my fun has never wrecked an internal wiki. I'll leave it to historians to judge between my fun and theirs.
Why not? Some people can "Yeah, I get it. Very Clever." just from the description. Some people CAN'T. The proof of this is in math class where people struggle with word problems. You are in the category of people that get it from description only. Have empathy for the people that need to see it in action.
Also, you know, it's fun. Don't ruin it for others because you can't/won't/don't