Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I doubt anyone would disagree that triple negatives aren't easy to parse.


If that sentence hadn't mentioned triple negatives, I don't think I would have noticed anything abnormal about it.


It's not the triple negative that is the culprit here though. It's the inherent ambiguity in a phrase such as "never been better", which could be either a negative or positive statement. I'm sure there's a name for that construct?


I think tptacek's sentence would need a 'than' to have a valid reading as a positive statement. 'never been better' is ambiguous by itself, but by the time you put it into a sentence it may or may not be ambiguous.

So my answer is mu.


Now I'm curious how natural language parsers handle triple negatives.


You'll be pleased to know that they don't not do them unwell.


I'm not sure if I wouldn't be dissapointed to hear that they couldn't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: