Reading the Wikipedia version of that, it is full of HUGE assumptions:
> Axiom 5: Necessary existence is a positive property
That's in total disagreement with evolution. No being is really necessary.
> Corollary 1: The property of being God-like is consistent.
Now that's in huge disagreement with any religious book, as all of them are full of inconsistencies.
Any proof lacks any value if the starting axioms lack value by themselves.
Newton wasted years of his life studying the bible. We shall simply view all this as the waste of time it was and simply expect future genius to not do the same.
> Axiom 5: Necessary existence is a positive property
That's in total disagreement with evolution. No being is really necessary.
> Corollary 1: The property of being God-like is consistent.
Now that's in huge disagreement with any religious book, as all of them are full of inconsistencies.
Any proof lacks any value if the starting axioms lack value by themselves.
Newton wasted years of his life studying the bible. We shall simply view all this as the waste of time it was and simply expect future genius to not do the same.