Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems pretty clear to me (Occam's razor):

1) he was told he had to use the same monitoring process all the other providers were using

2) as a state secret, he couldn't reveal he was doing it ever to his users

3) if he complied he would totally undermine the nature of his service

Anything else is superfluous.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: