> How is that? It's my browser running on my computer. Shouldn't I have final say over what I do and don't see?
You're free not to use a site. But if you are viewing a site, why would you even expect to use it without also helping to provide for its upkeep?
> Nobody has a right to show me advertising, just as I don't have a right to read someone's content. If publishers have a problem with it they need to find a way to not display content to clients who are blocking ads.
Attempts which would be blocked by ABP's author. That would be an arms race. Maybe we should start fighting it, though. It would be much harder to maintain that they're not trying to screw over site owners with the extension.
You're free not to use a site. But if you are viewing a site, why would you even expect to use it without also helping to provide for its upkeep?
> Nobody has a right to show me advertising, just as I don't have a right to read someone's content. If publishers have a problem with it they need to find a way to not display content to clients who are blocking ads.
Attempts which would be blocked by ABP's author. That would be an arms race. Maybe we should start fighting it, though. It would be much harder to maintain that they're not trying to screw over site owners with the extension.