Talking about the post office's losses without citing that context [universal service] is disingenuous.
The article devotes much discussion to the Universal Service Obligation; its origin, rationale, effects, and ways it can be updated without generating the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars of losses the USPS is now racking up. Did you read the article?
But personally, I like getting my mail no matter where I live.
Should the rest of the country pay tens to hundreds of billions of dollars for your convenience, if they don't share your preference?
The article devotes much discussion to the Universal Service Obligation; its origin, rationale, effects, and ways it can be updated without generating the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars of losses the USPS is now racking up. Did you read the article?
But personally, I like getting my mail no matter where I live.
Should the rest of the country pay tens to hundreds of billions of dollars for your convenience, if they don't share your preference?