I am the creator of Visimojo and I will be happy to answer your questions. The app is still in beta and my todo list is rather long, but I decided to release it publicly and collect some feedback.
Q: You where asking permission to perform tasks when I was not using the app on my google account. Why is that? :-)
Tip: Id love to see you obscure the URL instead of using ID:
http://visimojo.com/survey/take/114 as it would be extremely easy to ruin other peoples surveys. :-)
Q: I will definitely use this app when creating my surveys, and I would very well will be willing to pay for it!
What would your pricing-structure be?
I like the URL idea - ID numbers are not very friendly (and as you said are bad for privacy).
I'd like to keep pricing simple - pay a fixed price and use it as much as you like. This to me is both easier to implement and will encourage people to use it more.
But about the pricing; consider this:
* You'd probably earn hellofalot more with individual pricing? I mean, I pay per sent SMS/Email/Whatever on other services. It's the usage that will cost you money in terms of data-transfers?
If I'd use your service with a newsletter of 100 000 subscribers, let's say 10% would answer my very quick survey, you'd have to host these 10 000 users throughout the survey with $26 in your pocket.
It might be sustainable in the long run if you have enough users that does not utilize the service that much - but with a couple of enterprise users you might be out of luck(?)...
I'd still consider thinking twice about your price-structure, you might want to charge 24/month, including X answers or something?
I'd certainly be willing to pay a fixed price per month (Maybe lower) and then $0.xx per answer to my survey?
I got a screen resolution error at 1280x1024, but clicking onto the demo video and then hitting back in my browser got me to the app (which looked absolutely fine at my res).
Other than that, looks awesome, and really responsive on my slow netbook which is great for an app like this.
Thank you! The reason it runs nice on your netbook is that it was developed on a netbook :)
I should handle the resolution better - I set 1366x768 as a base minimum for screen size, but a width of 1280 is perfectly acceptable, and I will update it in a moment.
Your users are going to be non-technical such as managers not software developers. The message is misleading. It is talking about screen size not screen resolution.
Moreover, why shouldn’t I be able to use this at 1024x768?
Is there a real reason you can't just get rid of the size requirement? People can see to resize their browser window if they're feeling cramped and it's practical.
