Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Shame you can't do this with something like juggling. :D

I suppose you can somewhat metaphorically replace speed with numbers there. In that juggling four balls is a lot like three, but faster. Getting the initial three going, though... Grrr.





You can practice with two balls, sound the same motions you would with three. And if you really want to focus you can practice making a consistent toss with one ball. Two is probably better bang for the buck.

Right, I was just pushing the idea that you can't always literally slow things down. That said, no reason you couldn't pantomime juggling really slowly. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if that is a legit path to getting going?

> Shame you can't do this with something like juggling

You need not limit yourself to a single gravitational constant.

I look forward to video clips of Elon juggling on Mars!


You can also use light handkerchiefs that fall slower to the ground than balls, pins, or flaming chainsaws.

I forgot about the handkerchief trick to slow things down.

Funny. I can do 3 balls. I can do 3 clubs. I can do 3.

4? My brain revolts.


Even dumber, for me, is that I can easily juggle two in either hand. Try to do the same in both hands at the same time? Brain basically recoils in horror.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: