i know zig, i’ve been using it for a few years, i have multiple small projects as well. zig ref is fine, but i’m critical of std and i've grown to be critical on the disposition of the team itself.
the source code has always been the main source of truth and documentation. which means no documentation. std is littered with undocumented behaviours, the build system is still something many people use half-blind. and while i’m fine with breaking changes, but the way they’re just dropped onto our laps with, it seems, almost zero thought put into how to acquaint the users with it. (i started to feel almost as if patience in introducing the concepts and interfaces is one of those things that is below andrew)
while i admit that zig’s authors’ claim to technical excellence is deserved, communication has never been excellent. i’m sure there are people who would gladly involve themselves in documentation efforts, but the chances of receiving andrew’s ire and demeaning disposition are so great that it might be paralysing such efforts leaving it to the Guy himself who's not too wont to educate others.
the source code has always been the main source of truth and documentation. which means no documentation. std is littered with undocumented behaviours, the build system is still something many people use half-blind. and while i’m fine with breaking changes, but the way they’re just dropped onto our laps with, it seems, almost zero thought put into how to acquaint the users with it. (i started to feel almost as if patience in introducing the concepts and interfaces is one of those things that is below andrew)
while i admit that zig’s authors’ claim to technical excellence is deserved, communication has never been excellent. i’m sure there are people who would gladly involve themselves in documentation efforts, but the chances of receiving andrew’s ire and demeaning disposition are so great that it might be paralysing such efforts leaving it to the Guy himself who's not too wont to educate others.