This breach of Magna Carta negates the legitimacy of the Crown, so the people are entitled to remove the King, his heirs and his lickspittle parliament. We could do worse than to follow the example of the French in establishing their republic.
I'm not an expert, but does the Magna Carta guaranteed a right to a jury trial?
I assume you are referring to clause 39, but it says "or" indicating a jury trial is not necessary?
> No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
This sounds like sovereign citizen or "freeman of the land" nonsense, but the one kernel of truth is that when people grow tired of the government, the inevitable end is a revolution, whether violent or nonviolent.
Is it really though? Why are the courts so inundated with crime that this is happening in the first place? Are there uncomfortable truths not being talked about? Is that the reason why?
The partial closure of parts of the criminal justice system during COVID led to a backlog which in turn appears to have pushed the system to a point it has been unable to properly recover from - there are some very interesting statistics here [0].
As to why that is - the explanations I've seen generally feature incompetence amongst various parts of the system and a degree of underfunding (or perhaps poorly managed funding) - including the fact that there is a shortage of criminal barristers due to poor pay. Juries themselves don't seem to be cited as a huge problem.
