@dang this may be a good candidate for the second chance pool

The author has a strong quantum physics background, and makes testable predictions [1].

This isn't circular fluff as argued in this thread, but a mathematically fledged theoretical framework.

1. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/15/11/115319/3372193/Un...

there are infinite buddha worlds in even a raindrop. No kidding. These are very old ideas.

Just read translations of the old Zen masters. Or better yet, translations of translations. The translators will reveal that sometimes small errors with each iteration are sometimes beneficial. But I digress.

Circular Argument - by defining consciousness as a universal field (with zero evidence), the outcome of individual consciousness as an illusion is preordained.

The math was beyond me. So, I asked Gemini 3 for help. I share what they replied to my many questions here:

https://gemini.google.com/share/1a6663a83898

Schrodinger and Penrose: pro. Einstein: con.

My favorite part is the debate between His Holiness the Dalai Lama and President Donald Trump on Maria Strømme's interesting effort.