Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It really depends what field. In some branches of history, archaeology, and linguistics, for instance, many matters of emerging consensus often reach students only through lecturers’ handouts that are not put online. What a curious person will find on the internet and in general-reference books can be a decade or more behind, and viewed within the field as horribly out of date.


If that information were valuable to learn, someone with access would be republishing it online.


Is "published online" the bar for valuable information? At this point published online is a good signal for junk information.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: