Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you trying to claim that Rust isn't safer than C++ for some kind of safety? I can't really see how you would argue that. It's memory safe, and it has a much stronger type system which reduces the chance of non-memory safety bugs. What type of safety are you thinking of?


Rust lacks type-programming features necessary for pragmatic type safety without performance concessions.


Can you give a concrete example? Rust has extremely good type safety.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: