Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The government created this problem when they enacted Section 230. This is at the root of the misinformation and disinformation... social media companies are not responsible for the harm.

The simple solution is repeal Section 230. When information can be transmitted instantly on a massive scale, somebody need to responsible for the information. The government should not police information but citizens should be allowed to sue social media companies for the harm caused to them.



The practical end result of repealing Section 230 is that companies will crack down on any even remotely controversial speech because that's the only way to avoid lawsuits.


The New York Times has published plenty of stories you could call controversial. Just this morning the top headline was that Trump lied at the UN. Trump has sued the Times for defamation, yet the paper stands by its reporting. That’s how publishing works: if you can’t defend what you publish, don’t publish it. The Section 230 debate is about whether large online platforms such as Facebook should bear similar accountability for the content they distribute. I think they should. That's the only way we can control misinformation and disinformation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: