Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That’s not the title of the article (granted, it doesn’t have one), and the author calls the analogy “questionable”.


Most analogies are questionable in my experience - I find calling something a "questionable analogy" makes it a tiny bit less likely that people will pick it apart with thousands of reasons it's not an exact match for what it's describing.


In the HTML's <title>-tag, it's called "Lossy encyclopedia".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: