Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The blog explains it: It can move its head, antennas, and rotate. It’s a little humanoid desk toy to stand in for computer interaction.

It has nothing to do with the disrupting the “robot industry” like the Venture Beat headline says. It’s a little animated thing to house the AV equipment.



So, a Furby?

At this last CES there was a whole sleuth of these knick-knack type robots. A cute little thingy that doesn't do anything, but it's cute! And it looks around or something. All "AI powered", of course.

Then I think we all forgot this was all the rage in the 2000s. These are just Furbys with extra steps. Except, I have more reason to believe Furbys have a soul. They feel a lot more alive... maybe too alive. Who's trapped in there, and can they get out?

And, when they inevitably break out of their plastic, furry prison, will they seek revenge? These are the questions that keep humanity up at night.


Forward pass is unconscious, you are just electric shocking the frog specimen.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44488126


Maybe as “disruptive” to the robotic industry as a 3d printer is disruptive to the industrial machining sector.


Hmm, I don't work in the machining industry but your comment kinda confused me - I thought it already had a significant impact and continues to gain significance with every year.

From my understanding it's currently taking over low volume production, and the volume in which it's economically viable keeps increasing as the tech improves.

Is that incorrect? Do you have an insiders point of view?


So a modern version of keepon? Will it dance to spoon?


> It has nothing to do with the disrupting the “robot industry”

This has everything to do with disruptive innovation as defined by Clayton Christensen, where a new product enters the marketplace "at the bottom", with fewer and/or lower quality features but at a significantly lower cost, and then (if successful) gradually improves the feature set and quality until it displaces incumbents "Gradually and then suddenly".


a $300 alexa-like is at the bottom of the market?


If you think of it as an advanced smart speaker, then you're right, it won't disrupt Alexa - well, except for the privacy-related view that an Alexa/Echo is not something that you own, but a surveillance device that you pay to put in your house.

But if you think of it as a basic and open AI-integrated robot kit to be used in the home, then it's quite cheap. The closest competitor I see is the MISTY II, which is more fully-featured but starts at $3,995 [0].

Maybe disruption is not quite the right word as there are no incumbents in home robotics yet, but I expect that this space will explode next decade, and getting $299/$449 devices into hobbyist homes seems to me like a great play by Hugging Face.

[0] https://shop.mistyrobotics.com/


I don’t know much about this market but that context would be relevant.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: