And I disagree with those laws as well, since, quite famously, the Supreme Court could only come up with subjective rules around what pornography even is.
Quoted: I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it…
In other words, it is entirely subject to the judge whether something is porn or not.
It is famously hard to define, so the outcome is that to avoid liability you must err on the side of censorship, and not free speech. Given that Texas has used civil liability laws in incredibly bad faith around abortions, I am not inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.
This is the WHOLE point of the right to free speech.