You are correct, of course, but do you think your comment would be better received if you presented it as constructive feedback? e.g.
Consider enhancing your privacy policy to match industry standards, similar to OpenRouter. Focus on addressing significant questions, like how your product stands out from established competitors. Ensure there’s no confusion between Grok and Groq. Also, verify the availability of features like access to o4 models to avoid any misunderstandings.
Who cares if it’s better received? They are lying about model access and incorrectly identify the producers of AI models. This business seem to be made by unserious people and sounding the alarm is the correct thing to do.
I considered being polite but the fact OP had already chosen to not answer these actual questions makes me question why anyone would trust this site with their payment data or even personal data.
Consider enhancing your privacy policy to match industry standards, similar to OpenRouter. Focus on addressing significant questions, like how your product stands out from established competitors. Ensure there’s no confusion between Grok and Groq. Also, verify the availability of features like access to o4 models to avoid any misunderstandings.