Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm saying get the git providers to change the default back too.


If you're going to convince me that you're "anti-woke" suggestions are better than the "woke" suggestions that got us here in the first place, do so in the traditional way. Make an argument for why moving back to master makes substantive improvements in my workflow as a developer and not because you find it aesthetically concerning. And why it is financially beneficial for the globe to spend the engineer-years it would take to make this change.

Also, I don't know that I'm convinced that 'master' in this scenario is more descriptive than 'main'.


The change originally was never about developer experience.


This is sort of the inverse of the sunk cost fallacy. We are where we are, if we want to move back, it's not implicitly rational to move back solely for the opposite reason that we moved forward.

Moving back has additional costs, it doesn't simply undo the costs of moving forward.


Why? To make people type more letters and waste their employer's time?

For the record; I still use master branch for personal projects. But trying to impose it on anyone else is madman-levels of obsession that you might want to work out with a therapist. It simply does not matter to anyone with actually relevant priorities.


It wasn't obsessive to change it in the first place?


Not really, "master" is about as indistinct of a term as "merge" and "rebase" are. There are huge amounts of git ergononics that can be improved and master branch is one of them.

If it wasn't for muscle memory and my bash aliases, I'd be using main too. Get a life and stop bitching about default environment variables, it's a huge red-flag to employers.


We aren't going to rehash the whole history here and it's disingenuous to try discussing the accuracy / pertinence of the word master here when that wasn't what originated the change in the first place.


If you can't formulate an argument as to why "master" is meaningfully better than "main", you are no better than the culture warriors who insisted on changing it in the first place.


How/why to justify something that was unjustified in the first place?


I'm not asking you to justify something that was unjustified in the first place -- I'm asking you to justify what you're asking people to do now. Why is it worth everyone's time and effort to migrate back to using "master" rather than "main"?


To remove the political prejudice injected into it.


Ask Linus Torvalds.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: