That is how Hollywood does movies. Other film traditions will more accurately adapt the source material. For example, many animes are a shot-for-shot recreation of manga.
>For example, many animes are a shot-for-shot recreation of manga.
This is something of a newer phenomenon in the grander history of anime as an artform. Osamu Tezuka, one of the founding fathers of the modern anime industry, notably created the filler-heavy formats of yesteryear that were the dominant form of popular televised anime well into the 21st century. There are notable early outliers like Yu Yu Hakusho and Death Note, but most of the popular anime had their runtimes padded all to hell in order to continually cash in on the unpredictable zeitgeist popularity of their source material. This trend of creating manga-accurate adaptations was largely spawned during the mid-80's OVA boom (wherein many one-shot OVAs were functionally made as high-production-value advertisements for their corresponding manga), but it largely didn't make the leap to TV anime until well after the turn of the century.
> This is something of a newer phenomenon in the grander history of anime as an artform
It's hard to argue about 'a newer phenomenon' which is now closer to Astro Boy than our current time.
> most of the popular anime had their runtimes padded all to hell in order to continually cash in on the unpredictable zeitgeist popularity of their source material
You can't 'faithfully recreate shot-for-shot' an ongoing title, you would be out of the material way earlier than out of the runtime.
This is not even diving on the differences between the manga and the manga eiga.
>It's hard to argue about 'a newer phenomenon' which is now closer to Astro Boy than our current time.
Last I checked, the 2010s are closer to now than to the 1960s. This didn't become the norm until the 2010s. I called out Death Note and Yu Yu Hakusho as notable exceptions and did note the initial start of it in smaller OVAs. I guess if you're going from the earliest OVA that did this then your comment does make sense. I was thinking more in terms of when the trend to do so became dominant.
>You can't 'faithfully recreate shot-for-shot' an ongoing title, you would be out of the material way earlier than out of the runtime.
Right. The modern trend is to wait until a series is done, or at least until it has enough plot/action in the manga to cover a full season before entering production. Chainsaw Man was over before the first season of the anime came out. Demon Slayer finished around the time the anime started. This is a new-ish trend among big popular TV anime. So as I said, it used to be that anime would be produced while the manga was still ongoing and popular, which lead to filler as a much more common phenomenon.
>This is not even diving on the differences between the manga and the manga eiga.
By all means, feel free to split hairs. I was just trying to give newcomers a more zoomed-out view of the history of anime, but if you'd like to delve into details, have at it.
> Last I checked, the 2010s are closer to now than to the 1960
That was a quip to "trend of creating manga-accurate adaptations was largely spawned during the mid-80's OVA boom"[0]
> until it has enough plot/action in the manga to cover a full season before entering production
Yes, though this is still not universal and still things go south with anime-original titles (WEP is 10/13, sadly)
> it used to be that anime would be produced while the manga was still ongoing and popular, which lead to filler as a much more common phenomenon.
> By all means, feel free to split hairs
Yes, I don't object this, though I was thinking more in how the media does not/translate. I even re-read Kaji/Akagi first story from Tsuredzure Children as this is the one best examples of a media adaptation.
[0] Gokushufudō would be an extreme modern 1:1, btw
PS:
ah, read the sibling comment
imma in the bar RN, if you want a hear an opinion on that sweet cash - drop a note
In some cases, the runtime being padded with filler was less about cashing in and more about trying to not catch up to the manga too quickly.
FMA (2003) is a fun example of this not happening, where they basically wound up creating a custom ending to the series because they got ahead of the manga.
>In some cases, the runtime being padded with filler was less about cashing in and more about trying to not catch up to the manga too quickly.
Right, so rather than stopping production on the anime until the manga had time to get ahead, most anime created filler to cash in on the popularity of the ongoing manga, rather than to try to make the most faithful adaptation. Nowadays it's more common for anime to halt production and release a follow-up season years later when the manga has gotten farther ahead.
shot-for-shot recreations are a waste of time. a robot or algorithm could copy. we watch adaptations to see a new perspective on an old tale. if you want a copy, just read the original.
