Please don't take HN threads into gender flamewar hell (or any flamewar hell). It's just what we're trying to avoid here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Have humans fundamentally changed since 50 years ago?

Was there something fundamentally wrong with women 50 years ago that we "fixed"?

> Was there something fundamentally wrong with women 50 years ago that we "fixed"?

Women used to be pregnant or with a lot of small kids for most of their early adulthood, that changed about 50 years ago with hormonal contraceptives.

Edit: I wouldn't say that either way is wrong here, but hormonal contraceptives and hormonal medicines in general is certainly a very fundamental change to a human.

societal roles and expectations have certainly changed.

If societal roles and expectations make one gender less successful, is that something wrong with "men"/"women" or rather something wrong with the roles and expectations?

Would this question ever have worked the other way?

You are implying there is. What is wrong with men today according to you?

that pretty misadrenistic thing to say

let have a look and reverse genders in your example.

>>> Why are majority students men not women

>> perhaps there's something fundamentally wrong with women today? I'd look there.

hmmm....

Please don't take HN threads further into gender flamewar hell (or any flamewar hell). It's just what we're trying to avoid here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html