I don't think it's always necessary if the paper makes it really clear how thing... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		slaymaker1907 on Aug 20, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: MIT leaders describe the experience of not renewin... I don't think it's always necessary if the paper makes it really clear how things were done. And just because the code is available, it doesn't mean that it is actually reproducible or comprehensible.

Groxx on Aug 20, 2024 [–]

Papers without code are sorta by definition not reproducible or comprehensible though. And yet somehow it's not part of the peer reviewing process.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact