I already explained that in my long description above- most of those mainstream recommendations make sense in the context of improving airflow and ventilation.
These ideas and interventions are in no way mutually exclusive: the mainstream recommendations are mechanism agnostic, they are just doing things that have been shown to work. And the toxic gas theory also doesn't claim to explain all causes of SIDS, so if some interventions work but don't fit with that framework, it would suggest a possible additional mechanism. For example, I wonder how the smoking and heat fit in as factors since those are factors I would expect would lead to people trying to ventilate more, but I don't really know what behaviors like that correlate with those.
After hearing about this theory, my first thought was that ceiling fans should also be extremely effective at reducing SIDs rates, and it turns out they are massively effective- reducing rates by 72% [1].
These ideas and interventions are in no way mutually exclusive: the mainstream recommendations are mechanism agnostic, they are just doing things that have been shown to work. And the toxic gas theory also doesn't claim to explain all causes of SIDS, so if some interventions work but don't fit with that framework, it would suggest a possible additional mechanism. For example, I wonder how the smoking and heat fit in as factors since those are factors I would expect would lead to people trying to ventilate more, but I don't really know what behaviors like that correlate with those.
After hearing about this theory, my first thought was that ceiling fans should also be extremely effective at reducing SIDs rates, and it turns out they are massively effective- reducing rates by 72% [1].
[1] https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/family-resources-educati...