Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I pay $0 a year to host my Next.js website on S3.

It's only free while you have no traffic. Getting a single post on the top of HN could cost you e.g. $10.



I find the idea of using AWS for personal use absolutely terrifying. You are signing up for literally unlimited costs. If my site gets ddosed, I don’t want a $100,000 bill, I want the site to go offline.


Honestly this is a valid concern. I am not knocking AWS and they are working with us but $100000 in one week from bad code in a Java service is really nerve racking. For the record the only reason I use AWS over other clouds is because they actually work with you when stuff like this happens. ( Its taking a long time but we are hopeful)


then use Lightsail or set a maximum size for your ec2 autoscaling group


Or stop overengineering and use a PaaS like Netlify.


But outbound traffic


Cloudflare Pages is free.


It's very odd that AWS doesn't support spending caps. A lot of other services and paid APIs I use have them, and they save me a ton of stress.


As long as enough people use AWS despite the lack of spending caps and the stress it causes, it just means Amazon effectively monetizing your risk tolerance.


I would prefer to pay like this, especially since I'm not writing a ton of blog posts. To me it's better to pay $10 for a viral post than pay $10/month continuously with little traffic. It depends on your use case though. Low traffic sites like mine are great for hosting on S3.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: