Half the comments here are saber-rattling at the title of the article, without the understanding that the title itself is an egregious mischaracterization. Yeah, the court issued a rule, but the layman's interpretation of "that means they found actual wrong doing" is not correct. It's just a preliminary injunction, apparently based on some flawed misinterpretation of the actual communication that took place [1].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36619241