Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In this case the researchers know what works but the teachers aren't taught the science of reading.

https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2018/09/10/hard-words-why...

https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/02/12/582465905/the-gap...



Sure, its not great that they weren't taught the science behind it, but on one episode they quoted a teacher who was taught the new way, and she rejected it because 'she didn't like it'

From the transcript:

"She didn’t come away with an understanding of how children learn to read. She didn’t really learn about the science of reading. Other teachers told me they did. They say the training they got during Reading First opened their eyes. Changed their lives even. Some of them still use the materials they were given. But for Christine Cronin and many other teachers, Reading First represented a change they didn’t like. They were told to follow a curriculum. With structured lessons like the one you heard when Bush visited the second-grade classroom in Florida. To Christine Cronin, it felt traditional and old-fashioned."

And from a later episode:

"Like Christine Cronin. She’s the teacher in Boston who tried to get on board with Bush’s Reading First program, but said the curriculum she was given felt old-fashioned. She remembers looking at the pictures in books by Fountas and Pinnell and Lucy Calkins and thinking – that’s what I want my classroom to be like.

Christine Cronin: They framed a picture of reading instruction that seemed beautiful. Like, softly lit rooms. Kids were gonna have cozy nooks where they were curling up with a good book. It got your heart, along with your mind."

This teacher wasn't worried about the science, she was sold on the 'look and feel'.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: