Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That doesn’t strike me as a good thing.

Maintenance of “safety needs” is part and parcel of finding love and belonging in the first place. If we’re offloading that all together, then yeah I can see how more and more get depressed and suicidal. They don’t have anything to live for when you get down to it.



That's not what moving up means; they're cumulative from the bottom up. You can't move up to the next level until all lower levels are consistently met.

Moving up means those needs are being met satisfactorily and can be maintained without prolonged attention. And if a lower level stops being met, your level will fall to that level until it is met again.

I.e., if you're hungry and don't know when your next meal is, then who the hell cares if you're anxious, angry, or happy? You have more pressing concerns.


Right, I'm aware of Maslow's work, I just think it's wrong on a number of different dimensions, or at least incomplete.


Sure, I agree, at best it is a gross simplification.

But it’s useful and, in my opinion, captures the most basic relationship which is that some needs have higher priority than others and will drive those other needs to the recesses.

What about that do you disagree with?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: