Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, you misunderstood. If somebody says, "I have only $10, I can't afford to do X" then the existence of millions of people who did X on $6 is directly relevant. It's not an abstract appeal to, "perk up, people used to have it worse!" It's a refutation of an explicit claim.


You don't think that's a simplistic analysis? For that to be true all external factors would have to remain constant and they obviously haven't.


Yes, it's very simplistic, but I think directionally correct.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: