Your description is quite simplistic and your comparison is fallacious.
The correct spelling of words is defined and agreed upon and there is no moral judgement involved.
That is not the case with "inclusive language", yet by making these alternative suggestions Google is making a judgement that my word choice is wrong because it doesn't fit politically correct standards espoused and insisted upon by a vocal minority of society.
An editor used by millions should auto-correct spelling not decide what words are morally correct. It doesn't take much imagination to see where this is headed.
The correct spelling of words is defined and agreed upon and there is no moral judgement involved.
That is not the case with "inclusive language", yet by making these alternative suggestions Google is making a judgement that my word choice is wrong because it doesn't fit politically correct standards espoused and insisted upon by a vocal minority of society.
An editor used by millions should auto-correct spelling not decide what words are morally correct. It doesn't take much imagination to see where this is headed.
This is a slippery slope if there ever was one.