From a military-strategic point of view? Absolutely.
But this is a political decision that should not be taken in haste, every choice here has significant ramifications and allowing for a less hasty debate is a good thing in my opinion.
This has been debated in Sweden (and Finland) for... How many decades now? Four? Five? Even longer? The last one, AFAICR. How many decades more would your "less hasty debate" take; another five or six? And when shit happens on the ground, all those decades of blathering turn out to be worthless.
The correct response is not another sixty years of dithering that will at some point turn out to be equally worthless, but to get off one's indecisive arse and join NATO. The best time to do so was years ago; the second best was yesterday. The best remaining realistically achievable time is now.
But this is a political decision that should not be taken in haste, every choice here has significant ramifications and allowing for a less hasty debate is a good thing in my opinion.