Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Assuming your premise is true, is a strongly held belief a prerequisite to conduct a scientific inquiry? Or couldn't it just be any hypothesis, however crazy? It seems to me you are imposing a constraint that doesn't need to be there, and parent is arguing it doesn't deserve to be there, either.


The assertion I was responding to was not about the general possibility of using science to test these ideas.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: