> I clearly recall some people from the NoSQL camp (read non-relational data stores, non SQL enabled) saying that SQL itself is bad and something else is needed
I'm fond of SQL, you're either intentionally misinterpreting me or I'm not being clear. Non-relational databases are not about not using SQL, to believe so is dense and willfully ignorant.
I asked for specifics, you didn't provide them. I have to assume you're a troll at this point. I'm done here.
Ok, maybe I didn't use the right words or something:
There was an article from someone in the NoSQL camp which said that SQL is bad.
I DO and DID understand that the querying language isn't restricted to relational databases.
What I was saying I REMEMBER reading something a while ago on the website of a NoSQL store or in an article which said something along the lines: "SQL is old and should be deprecated anyway, it was time for something new"
THAT was why I was amused.
If you think I was trolling or anything, ok, I'll just stop commenting on this site. It's not worth the trouble at all.
No, wrong, irrelevant, who said this?