If the underlying RSS technology still works just fine and has momentum, then saying it is dying is going to kill that momentum. This sounds like a marketing problem more than anything else.
Which is to say: It is a problem to be solved with communication and coordination tools kinda like this (but much lower urgency)
Good point. There isn't even a good website for RSS. RSS.com is a podcasting service. RSS.org is the website of some guy who has these initials. The most official source is the wikipedia page, which obviously is a just neutral explanation, not trying to advertise it. There's a site called You Need Feeds[1], which is trying to advertise it, but it doesn't look official and doesn't show up on the first page when you google RSS (which according to keyword planner 10K to 100K people do in the US alone).
Which is to say: It is a problem to be solved with communication and coordination tools kinda like this (but much lower urgency)
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2014/04/09/what-heartbleed-can-tea...