My point thing is, even dumb people think in much more nuanced terms, so this kind of reductive fake-logic argument does not work. Using it just makes you look like someone who is not able to think about real world.
You may seeming win debate, because people stop to engage. But, you wont convince neither on rational nor on emotional level, because that argument is weak.
I generally don’t try and engage in such conversations. In the case of matrix, terrorism existed long before its existence and other encrypted services were available. Unless you block them all, terrorists will just follow the path of least resistance.
People can actually distinguish between the two which is the reason that as funny as argument is, it does absolutely nothing.