As PivotalTracker migrates to a subscription model, projects with multiple users can either pay Pivotal or make their projects public and free (the GitHub model).
From the directory of public projects on the PivotalTracker website, it looks as though many companies are opting for the public free option even though all their tasks, comments, screenshots, etc are now public.
To be clear - PivotalLabs isn't forcing them to do this - but I just wanted to put it out there to make sure anyone considering paying for their PT projects to remain public are aware of the outcome.
Plus if companies are making their agile workflow public (knowingly or unknowingly), it makes interesting observation.
From the directory of public projects on the PivotalTracker website, it looks as though many companies are opting for the public free option even though all their tasks, comments, screenshots, etc are now public.
To be clear - PivotalLabs isn't forcing them to do this - but I just wanted to put it out there to make sure anyone considering paying for their PT projects to remain public are aware of the outcome.
Plus if companies are making their agile workflow public (knowingly or unknowingly), it makes interesting observation.