> If you introduce a technology into the world, you have to consider the possibilities every type of person
You can't.. the human mind simply can't understand every type of person or even 90% of every type of person. If this is a requirement for advancement nothing would ever get done due to the complexity of this part of the problem alone.
> with every possible aim
Again, we are limited beings this is not possible.
> having control of that technology. Not doing this is simply not scientific.
I'm going to disagree with your use of the term 'scientific in this case. The creation and use cases are entirely different steps in development.
The onus is not on the creator but the user. This is basis for modern law in the society we live in, we collectively choose to put this on the ' scientific community ' development will happen elsewhere and the moral civilization while nicer will remain in the stone age where it belongs.
You can't.. the human mind simply can't understand every type of person or even 90% of every type of person. If this is a requirement for advancement nothing would ever get done due to the complexity of this part of the problem alone.
> with every possible aim
Again, we are limited beings this is not possible.
> having control of that technology. Not doing this is simply not scientific.
I'm going to disagree with your use of the term 'scientific in this case. The creation and use cases are entirely different steps in development.
The onus is not on the creator but the user. This is basis for modern law in the society we live in, we collectively choose to put this on the ' scientific community ' development will happen elsewhere and the moral civilization while nicer will remain in the stone age where it belongs.