Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> They found a [recidivism] rate of 14 percent over a period averaging five to six years. Recidivism rates increased over time, reaching 24 percent by 15 years

That paragraph supports its own opposite conclusion, and actually makes me reconsider my opposition to sex offender registries.

You are telling me that the subset of the population that has been convicted of a sex crime once has a 1 in 7 chance of doing it again within just a few years, and a 1 in 4 chance within 15 years. And these are probably very conservative numbers - they are the rates for those who are actually caught and convicted again, which is a fraction of those who hurt others again (considered the oft-reported statistics that the vast majority most sex crimes go unreported).

What is the probability of committing a sex crime for adults who have never been convicted of any crime? I suspect it is hundreds of times lower than the rate for adult sex offenders.

EDIT: Wow, way to cherry pick you numbers. The very next paragraph is this:

> ...sex offenders had a total recidivism rate (for both sex crimes and nonsexual violent crimes) of approximately 36 percent over a period of five to six years...The 15-year recidivism rate is 13 percent for incest perpetrators, 24 percent for rapists, and 35 percent for child molesters of boy victims.

And further down:

> When recidivism rates for sex and nonsexual violent crimes were combined, 51 percent of untreated and 32 percent of treated subjects reoffended.

You are extremely dishonest for failing to include this additional data in your post.



And as other posts have pointed out, these numbers are still dramatically lower than the recidivism rate of non-sexual offenders.


I think you're misinterpreting those last quotes. It says that sexual offenders are less likely to reoffend than other violent criminals.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: