Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

California is a good example of what happens when pretty much any policy can be set by simple majority vote. The result is, to be kind about it, a lot of room for improvement.


It isn't.

Since Proposition 13 passed in 1978 (by a simple majority), California has required 2/3 majority votes in the legislature to increase taxes, and 2/3 majority votes for local elections to increase taxes.


If memory serves, there are still vast areas of policy that can be voted on by a simple majority.


It feels like the people here don't know that the state issuing "bonds" means it's taking on debt.

I lived in San Francisco for a while, and I don't remember the numbers and I know you can look this up, but it felt like I was voting No on up to dozen different bond proposals every two years. Doesn't matter, they always pass. (To clarify, I also don't remember if these were always up to a majority vote, but they almost always pass unless it's for something Californians don't like for whatever reason.)


> It feels like the people here don't know that the state issuing "bonds" means it's taking on debt.

It more than feels like it; most people don't know that.

As with other things, we can blame the total lack of financial education in our education system.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: