Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your timeline is a list of accusations. You’ve provided no evidence to support your claim of Russian’s interfering with the election.

More importanly: why should I care about Russians interfering with elections when we let corporations do that to a far greater extent?



The timeline contains confirmed events which are in fact evidence. They're not accusations; the point of the timeline is that these are things we know happened.


How, exactly, are you defining evidence?

I assume you don't mean in the P(A|B) > P(A) sense?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: