Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That sounds nuts; it seems like a huge liability that they are putting AP2 in the hands of consumers when it can be more dangerous than just the average driver...


What liability? You're supposed to constantly be aware and in control of your vehicle when using AP2.

(At which point, you may ask: What is the point of AP2..?)


It would be funny if in the future they say something like "So your new Tesla has Level 5 autonomy, but because the car still has a driving wheel, even if you turn on the Level 5 Autopilot, you're liable if an accident happens."


Of course that will be the case. Tesla will never be willing to accept liability for accidents.


collecting data at the customer's expense :) A classic playbook in our industry since RECaptcha came out


What? RECaptcha provides a very valuable service to website maintainers and users alike.


sure, I didn't intend to say that recaptcha doesn't provide a useful service, I was just saying that they pioneers, in our field, in "exploiting" (for lack of a better term in my vocabulary) a human work to solve a problem while training for free a neural network that is going to be used in a separate line of business. I think it's just pure genius




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: