Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | yvolution's commentslogin

No where else has more sky scrapers than Shanghai and Beijing, which easily affects your GPS signal.


If you mean buildings over 100m, then no:

    1 	Hong Kong
    2 	New York City
    3 	Tokyo
    4 	Dubai
    5 	Shanghai
Beijing is #20.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_with_most_skyscr...


I suspect that Tokyo might well have more. Anyway, the loss of accuracy in such a case wouldn't cause a consistent effect like this - it's normally not in a consistent direction and generally doesn't put you off by so far.


How maps look like depend on a whole bunch of other factors like the projection they use etc. Thus simply overlaying the maps and say, hey, this is distorted, is simply unfounded. It's very likely that Google maps etc may be adopting different projection systems so the users can have smooth using experience zooming in and out, and panning across the global without feeling the earth is round.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_projection


A map projection issue could a) easily be fixed, and b) would have been noticed and fixed already, as it would manifest in more places than just china.


I've been loving R since college and even wrote a love letter in the form of an R package for it. But Python just grabbed my heart these days after I learned to implement web things in Django. All the data magic are just a breeze.


well the argument of number is tricky since nobody has the number except Google. But another product of google's own, Google Trends, do help to see the decline. See here:

http://bit.ly/rlq9aR


that is people searching for 'google+'

a more accurate graph is:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=plus.google.com&ctab=0...

and that only shows up until the end of Sep and doesn't include the few days last week that google+ was linked to from the homepage of google.com


They are a bit less than allrecipes.com

http://www.google.com/trends?q=plus.google.com%2Callrecipes....

7M uniques: http://www.quantcast.com/allrecipes.com

I would estimate G+ getting 5M uniques. However, what would be interesting is to know the pageviews.

Facebook recently said they had recieved 500M visitors in a single day.


I don't think pageviews per visit is anywhere near what it is in Facebook - probably even by an order of magnitude. That is just my own perception from using it, though.

Facebook really do know how to suck time out of their users.


And the even sadder thing is, even if "Google+ now opens to everyone", the search term of google+ has retreated to near the low level of post-launch. sigh ...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: