Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more viktorcode's commentslogin

Anyone knows if their implementation supports animations? This is a feature missing from Apple's


According to the chrome platform status page, yes! https://chromestatus.com/feature/5114042131808256

>>>

  - Progressive decoding for improved perceived loading performance
  - Support for wide color gamut, HDR, and high bit depth
  - Animation support


Yes, but it's not recommended - it does not have inter-frame compression, so it is significantly less efficient than just having a regular video file and slapping 'gif' on it.


That's not strictly correct, it's rather that the current encoder does no inter-frame compression. Patches (and the frame system in general) does give tools to do some inter-frame compression (not as many as in video, but still quite expressive), just nobody stepped up to implement compression using them for animations yet.


Do you know of a video format that supports progressive decoding?


Progressive decoding isn't a very useful video feature because you need to decode the whole frame before you decode the next frame for inter-frame coding methods anyway.


It is, however, a very useful image format feature, giving you most information from the spinner/sticker/emoji/sprite, and refinig the already playing loop as it loads. That's why animated jxl is a bad video format — it's not a video format, it is a separate kind of seemingly weird thing.


Video files are not supported in <img> tags.


It does, I just tried it in Canary and the jxl test page did also show animations


What, isn't this the cue for someone to explain that it's ironic webp is really a video format which is a bad image format, and now we have symmetry that JpegXL is a good image format which is bad video format? :-D

(I don't know if any of this is true, but it sounds funny...)


Webp is also an incredibly bad animation format since it drops most of the inter-frame compression features of the video codec it was derived from.


Want to mention that not all German ISPs participate in IP-infringing content blocking. I use one that does not.


If by fortune you mean the said country won’t be able to protect its own IP abroad, then I agree


> We wouldn't tolerate secrecy in the calculations used to keep our buildings upright, and we shouldn't tolerate opacity in the software that keeps our tractors, hearing aids, ventilators, pacemakers, trains, games consoles, phones, CCTVs, door locks, and government ministries working.

Construction industry if full of privately owned technologies and closed source software, from architectural drawing board up to the last glass panel in a window.

Building are staying upright not because of openness, but because of the enforced standards for construction. Same can be applied to software orders.

Want to prevent a government office suite to be bricked remotely? Put forth requirements for autonomous work, self hosting, multiyear coverage for critical patches and ability to export the data at any moment in the format of your preference. Whoever provides this will get the contract.

This seems to me far more realistic aim than trying to enforce global legal straight jacket to be universally applied to all software and hardware products available for purchase in your country


Legal straight jacket? Doctorow is arguing for abandoning the legal straight jacket, not creating one. It seems you severley misread the article.


He wrote “calculations”


For the major part BYD sales performance is dependent on government subsidies in the country where they sell three quarters of all the cars they produce. That is a high risk factor investors don't like.


Can you provide a source for the government subsidies you say BYD is dependent on?



nice article. excellent proof that the whole industry is indeed driven by market force and profitability.

> "11 out of 17 listed Chinese automakers were profitable."

> "93 of 169 automakers operating in China have market shares below 0.1%."


Can you please elaborate on how iPhones are instruments of mass surveillance?



Probably not, as the same rules were applied to Apple devices in EU earlier, and no third party browser engines appeared.

But right now you can use uBlock origin lite in Safari. Or any other of multitude of other adblockers.


And what's your opinion if the law would oblige the companies to remove features their products have like tracking transparency popups? Two countries' courts already fined Apple for enforcing a popup that warns users about tracking across third party apps (a feature Apple themselves do not use)?


My prior POV was that Apple would jettison the feature globally, but the discussion elsewhere in this thread suggests that salami slicing at the software-level is a cost larger companies are willing to bear.


What do you expect this law will to achieve?


Fewer teen suicides


I wonder why the author doesn't use IL2CPP and sticks to Mono. IL2CPP does produce much faster code, making Mono builds obsolete. This should be the very first step you do if you care at all about performance in Unity.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: