The best presentation ever was at the time consoles pricing was around 350 and there was no console like the Playstation One and the Sony representative said: 299 and walks away, it does not matter the powerpoint software used, why a product is revolutionary is what matters. I don't care who was the Sony presenter.

As someone said, given a long time and every webpage becomes a porn fetish page

I prefer to use my $25 dashcam on my car (I did my research to find a pretty decent one). This dashcams always recording and mounted.

Could you pass on the results of your research? I don't think I found a dashcam at that price range, and I was actually looking to use an old smartphone as my dashcam, but it didn't seem like a good solution as 1. I would have to start the app manually whenever the phone powers up, and 2. I wouldn't want to leave the phone in a holder in the car all the time as it could invite thieves.

This comment discredits you.

This is a lame attempt at trolling.

Thank you Mr Scam

I put it in Google Drive on purpose to analyze if Google is also scanning as aggressively as Apple. So far no warnings.

Maybe someone needs to send these to some of the executives to make a point.

Did you try it with Apple, though? Or did anyone else?

These harmless generated images have a neuralhash equivalent to those provided in the NCMEC database submitted for testing. I repeat: Dont upload these harmless images to iCloud as Apple will assume its Child Porn (CSAM). Scripts were available on a GitHub repo but were removed because they may cause damage to others.

Is the hash database and the hashing algo public? Or how do you know these match?

Of course the database is public, it's on every iPhone!

No, it’s not.

> Scripts were available on a GitHub repo but were removed because they may cause damage to others.

Is there an archived link?

Edit: I guess this? https://gist.github.com/unrealwill/c480371c3a4bf3abb29856c29...

> Dont upload these harmless images to iCloud as Apple will assume its Child Porn (CSAM)

This is not true. They may match the hash, but the will not match the visual derivative.

The system is not as easily fooled as you think.

We've learned from YouTube how well matching content works well. Apple will be better right? Right?

Yes. We know that it is based on the papers explaining how it works.

> The system is not as easily fooled as you think.

I would like to believe that is true, but the negative consequences of even generating a false-positive is enough to not attempt to upload any image.

I tend to disagree here...

Based on the documentation from Apple, they are waiting to get *several* matches, *not only one* (we don't know what is *several* but I don't expect something like <= 3 pictures). Once the rate has been reached, they ask to a physical team to review the "positive matches", and deliberate if, yes or no, the images are CSAM or not.

If yes, after the manual process, the authorities are called.

Hypothetically, what happens if a viral event should persuade people to mass upload these images? Would Apple ad hoc modify their review protocol?

Nothing because these files won’t trigger a match.

you mean like how people got so fed up with ToS-mandated arbitration that they all decided to file motions simultaneously

it worked that time...

The consequence is that someone at Apple reviews the case, notices that its a false positive, and closes the case.

If Google Drive scans with the same database then how is your link working?

Because they are scanning with a different hash system.

Location: San Francisco, CA

Willing to work remote: YES

Relocation: YES

Technologies: React/Redux,Express Node.js, MongoDB, SQL Server, Formik, HTML, CSS, SASS/SCSS, JavaScript, ES6/7/8, jQuery, Bootstrap. Unity Engine technologies.

Resume: No agencies, full-time economic salary. Ask it at victorlafuentehugo@gmail.com

Email: victorlafuentehugo@gmail.com

What kind of work do you do?

It exists, is called SSL