I have general reviewer named Feynman with his personality that shits on anything other agents do and sends it back before it hits me and it sounds perfect to include some sound bites from YouTube clips. Great idea!!

Or just inspect element + press delete. In some cases you also need to then delete an extra gray overlay and re-enable scroll on the base html tag, but takes 30s

Seems like a lot of work to browse a site that makes a good joke once every month or so.

Old people don't go to war, how is that important. All that matters is who has the most 20 year olds they don't care about killing.

One thing exists and is known to work and be cheap. The other it's you musing about what will be possible. So they need to be judged differently. No land robot can move through a war environment in any effective way at the moment and also "open doors" etc. They are too slow. Not drones.

I know its a personal blog but the writing style is really full of himself. What a martyr, starting a second company.

It's hard to see the scale of what he's doing. Could be:

- I'm building a server farm in my homelab.

- I'm doing a small startup to see if this idea works.

- We're taking on AWS by being more cost effective. Funding secured.

Not an answer, but it this provides some illumination on the question: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/commit/d539a950ca4a66...

If you click the first link in the post, about funding, you’ll see they just raised $35mil.

I agree and consider a lot of regulation to be useful but there are some examples of this where I think we just perpetuate bad companies into existing when they'dgo bankrupt or have to pay wild salaries to compensate being shitty. But it just doesn't seem practical to expect people to stop working for bad companies. In the country I'm from the average salary is super close to the minimum wage with low unemployment so technically employees could change easily and find another job with the same minimum wage and still people stay at bad companies. It'd be the best regulator if people quit, even unions wouldn't need to exist, under this light a union just perpetuates a bad boss, but human nature is not changing so protections are needed.

Or 10 slightly larger ones

edit: https://www.24pharma.nl/paracetamol-eg-1000mg-120-tabletten

I’ve pretty much only ever seen them sold at 500mg; are you regularly seeing them where you are sold in 1g form?

The .nl indicates the netherlands. Many people in the netherlands vent/joke about how the doctors here only ever tell you to take paracetamol and come back in two weeks if it's still a problem (recursive solution).

However the last time I went to my GP she scoffed at me taking the maximum and suggested I take literally double the maximum recommended dose 4-5 times a day which totaled I think 2.5x the daily maximum on the package. I am very much a "believer" in science and reasonable medical authority but this experience sowed the seeds of doubt, because from what I have always heard, that can actually kill you or cause permanent liver issues. I was also taking diclofenac simultaenously, and when I told her how many mg, she asked "where can you even buy such small doses, that's what I would give a small child" =/

My understanding is double the max dose of paracetamol is the LD50. Seems crazy for your GP to advocate for that. Published recommended dose is assuming average weight, so maybe if you're a very large person, the advice makes some sense, but wow.

They are common in France, but not in such packages: There are restrictions that prevent you from buying more than than 8g/day (theoretically at least, I don't believe they are strictly applied in practice).

In Europe for sure they're also sold in 1g dosing. I think the packages don't contain lots of pills, though. Definitely not US style buckets of pills.

They are widely sold at 1000 mg (1g) tablets in Europe, but in many countries they require doctor's prescription. There are also purchase limits to the number of pills you can buy at once.

The linked size is also quite common in Belgium.

No, it's "I'm a more important person if I ok deals with big numbers" that always happens in a bubble.

He spun that story into "he was saving democracy" so it sounds like he paid for that reason. He will do the same here, he never does a wrong move you just can't see the 76D chess.

It's 100% a fraction of $60B. That's not debatable it's just simply fact.

I dunno it seems pretty irrational to me.

The question is what's the denominator.

Yep that was the joke!