My partner is an artist and she absolutely loves this.
For a start, it's a lottery. 2000 people who meet very broad but generally fair eligibility criteria (https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-culture-communications-a...) will get no-questions-asked income regardless of their skill or importance as artists, these being qualities that are both highly subjective and not fixed in time.
So you can be anyone – rich, poor, or something in between – and still be eligible for it. All you have to do is meet the criteria, which were created in consultation with artists.
Also, what is an artist? Thankfully that's not for me to say, because I have quite a narrow view of what art is, and that view would certainly exclude some people who were successful in the pilot.
My partner has been struggling to make an income from her art for over a decade. As she is a working artist under the pilot definition, she qualifies for the lottery even though she runs a small business (to be precise, she's self-employed – making and selling her art full time. There is a reasonable chance that you have seen it). She also thinks that the government could take many other practical steps steps to make life easier for artists, but that taking a small amount of money and giving it to random artists has a huge potential upside: practically no effort, many benefits.
I know several artists whose paintings will genuinely be hanging on walls for hundreds of years. Or prints. Or photographs. Most make ends meet, and one or two are comfortable. Their work ranges from truly amazing to decidedly mediocre (in my opinion). Did any of them get this magic lottery? Yes, some did. Others (including my partner) did not.
Ask her if she would prefer the government actually spend the money in ways that make it easier for arts / crafts people to actually make their own living. You know, instead of a handout. My wife doesn't think her self esteem would improve if she could only survive on a handout.
Ask her how much it costs for a stall at Showcase every year. Why does the RDS have this whole area sewn up? Why don't the government sponsor events like this? Why is the craft council absolutely useless? They can't organise anything, they just wait for gougers to set up ultra expensive events and then tag along.
Ask her if she'd prefer subsidised rent for her business in a decent location, in a city or town? Remember before Templebar got gentrified, it was an absolute shithole, decaying buildings that should have been condemned and torn down, and yet because it was cheap, it became the place for artists, designers, jewellery makers, cooks to set up, and became the most interesting part of Dublin. Sky High rent drove away all but the big chains, and now it's soulless. What do the small makers have now? Nothing.
What about subsidised shipping? Right now An Post are massively increasing the cost of their flat rate small parcel shipping within the country. Why invest in that, and make it easier for makers to ship their products at a reasonable, predictable price?
What about actual help with the "running a business" part, that many artists suck at?
I dunno. Giving free money to a few people, without even checking whether or not they need it, strikes me as unfair, lazy and short sighted. Why bother doing anything at all if you're getting free money? But reduce the cost and difficulty of running a business... That actually encourages it.
That's not true when tiling the Earth though. You need 12 pentagons to close the shape on every zoom level, you can't tile the Earth with just hexagons. That's also why footballs stitch together pentagons and hexagons.
> A side effect of the geometry simplication is that there are some very small gaps between states. Based on your use case, you'll need to handle the case of the point not being within any state borders. In these rare cases, you could fall back to a different method, such as distance checking centroid points, adding an episilon to all state borders, or simply asking the user. (The user may also be in another country or in the ocean...)
If your pre-simplification input geometries form a coverage[0], you can use e.g. ST_CoverageSimplify[1] or coverage.simplify[2] to simplify them without introducing gaps.
I wouldn't say it's correct to say that GEOS isn't particularly sophisticated. A lot of (certainly not all) GEOS algorithms are now ported from JTS, the primary author of which is Martin Davis (aka Dr JTS), who works at Crunchy Data, who provide the PostGIS extension. So the chain (again, mostly) goes JTS -> GEOS -> {PostGIS, Shapely} -> … . Martin's work is at the cutting edge of open-source GIS-focused computational geometry, and has been for a long time (of course, industry has its own tools, but that's not what we're talking about).
I can sort of see your point about the merits of global, spheroidal geometry, certainly from a user's perspective. But there's no getting around the fact that the geometry calculations are both slower (I'm tempted to say "inherently"…) and far more complex to implement (just look at how painful it is to write a performant, accurate r- or r*-tree for spherical coordinates) along every dimension. That's not going to change any time soon, so the projection workflow probably isn't going anywhere.
In my currently opened project I have: vtsls (for typescript), biome, emmet, and the snippets LSP running on the same file.
You can configure which LSPs you can run on a language basis. Globally and per project.
You can also configure the format on save actions the same way. Globally and per project.
I have astro project that on save runs biome for the front-matter part followed by prettier for the rest.
You are confused or wrong, and you are making incorrect assertions about a system "lying" to you on that basis: you can see this for yourself by typing `jj git init` (or just `jj init`) in an empty directory, touching some files, then running `jj status`. You will see a listing of the added files. The same happens if you commit these files, then make some changes to their contents: `jj status` will show the changed files, and `jj diff` will show the diff per file.
!!Con (pronounced “bang bang con”) 2024 is the last ever !!Con event, featuring two days of talks to celebrate the joyous, exciting, and surprising moments in computing. It takes place on the weekend of August 24-25, in the courtyard of the Baskin School of Engineering at UC Santa Cruz, in Santa Cruz, California, United States.
Agreed. As someone who often advocates for the use of Rust to speed up perf-sensitive Python functions (and in particular, in the GIS domain), this sounds like they haven't fully understood the problem or thought about how to solve it more efficiently with a spatial index (which is easily done in Geopandas, let alone PostGIS). However, the post is a bit vague on details so who really knows.
I see two sibling comments with reports of patchy reliability, so I'll note that it's been rock-solid for me (multiple daily deploys every weekday) since I last commented on it (about a year ago?)
For a start, it's a lottery. 2000 people who meet very broad but generally fair eligibility criteria (https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-culture-communications-a...) will get no-questions-asked income regardless of their skill or importance as artists, these being qualities that are both highly subjective and not fixed in time.
So you can be anyone – rich, poor, or something in between – and still be eligible for it. All you have to do is meet the criteria, which were created in consultation with artists.
Also, what is an artist? Thankfully that's not for me to say, because I have quite a narrow view of what art is, and that view would certainly exclude some people who were successful in the pilot.
My partner has been struggling to make an income from her art for over a decade. As she is a working artist under the pilot definition, she qualifies for the lottery even though she runs a small business (to be precise, she's self-employed – making and selling her art full time. There is a reasonable chance that you have seen it). She also thinks that the government could take many other practical steps steps to make life easier for artists, but that taking a small amount of money and giving it to random artists has a huge potential upside: practically no effort, many benefits.
I know several artists whose paintings will genuinely be hanging on walls for hundreds of years. Or prints. Or photographs. Most make ends meet, and one or two are comfortable. Their work ranges from truly amazing to decidedly mediocre (in my opinion). Did any of them get this magic lottery? Yes, some did. Others (including my partner) did not.