Thanks and great question - appends are atomic via Google's Sheet API, but updates/deletes are currently positional based on row ID. It's 'last-write-wins' for now if there are multiple concurrent updates.
Thank you! The idea of our target audience just vibe coding this themselves definitely gave us pause for thought while we were building it :)
We're thinking of playing around with the pricing right now to make sure it is cheaper to just use this than to spend the time and tokens recreating the logic. We will see how it plays out.
For your signup workflows, how sensitive would you be to latency? Would a 30 to 60 second delay be a dealbreaker, or are you looking for something that hits Slack the instant the row is created?
(The challenge with Google Sheets is we'd have to poll for changes)
Hi all - a friend and I have been dabbling in the entrepreneur space for years, but we never really pulled the trigger because of our corporate jobs. We suffer from the same thing that plagues a lot of engineers: we know how to build products, but we are weak at distribution and marketing.
We feel that being able to build is becoming table stakes and the ability to actually get a product into people's hands is more important than ever. We built SheetNinja (https://sheetninja.io) to force ourselves to learn that side of the business from the ground up.
We chose a validated market (sheets-to-api) so we could focus on the "how to find users" problem rather than wondering if the category was useful. It also fits our current "vibe coding" workflow i.e. when we use LLMs or Replit to spin up an idea, a Google Sheet is often the fastest way to handle CRUD without the friction of setting up a traditional database.
We are looking for feedback on the tool itself and the landing page. We have a lot of visitors but a lower sign-up rate atm.
the distribution muscle being a separate skill is so underrated. most technical founders assume if you build something good it finds its own audience. it almost never does. sounds like you're learning the hard way which is probably the only way
The "we chose a validated market so we could focus on learning distribution" framing is really smart and honestly something I wish I'd done earlier. I'm building a workspace/collaboration tool and spent way too long on the product side before realizing the distribution muscle is a completely separate skill that doesn't develop on its own.
One thing I've noticed from the sheets-as-backend pattern: the reason people
keep reaching for spreadsheets is because the editing UX is instant and familiar.Any tool that wants to replace this for non-technical users needs to nail that "just click a cell and type" experience. That's the hard part honestly.
We know the "Sheet to API" space is a little crowded, but we've always wanted to get better at distribution, marketing, and growth hacking. We needed a real product as a sandbox to learn, so we built a tool that we'd use ourselves.
There's a free tier. I'd love to hear any feedback on the product (or our marketing efforts!). Thank you!
