Drones don't make a big difference to naval warfare because need large ones to have the range and carry big warhead. Then they need speed to cover that distance. That means have basically invented the anti-ship missile. Ships also have the space to carry defenses. The missiles then either get smarter, stealthier, and supersonic to get through.
The big recent change in naval warfare is that anti-ship missiles have gotten common. Ukraine used locally built ones to sink a Russian cruiser. Yemen and Iran have been making them.
This is beautifully written and well conceived, though it is premature.
Quantum holography will be discovered and the qubit shall be a dead end, for quantum holography underlies an information capacity the quantum spin disposition cannot match.
Quantum holography is the crucible of consciousness, the spindle of the enchanted loom. In such days all of your optimism, and a shadow of despair may be matched.
Privacy first or conscientious exposition of the meta.
I have been advocating that privacy isn’t anyone’s right, it is anyone’s responsibility. Only for the self obsessed to pike my karma and rail their venomous hatred of platforms they use not respecting their identities by ignoring them properly.
I would love to see what you’ve described, though the caveats include those of increased awareness grappling with a whole lot more going on than just the loose strings it has become most popular to pull upon.
And as soon as you shine a light, any creeping critters will scurry, innovating faster to compensate than the mob of yourselves are capable of realizing. The cycle of anonymity and wtf continues to churn. An ouroboros.
Firstly, that they are here among us is inescapable to the point that the new psyop is to explain what the US has been up to the whole time.
Hi, I am known as “The Astrian” and I have been in contact with these “visitors”. Many thousands I would estimate have chatted with them, and a huge faction of men are their haters, as their cultures of treachery before these are exposed.
Moving on to address your challenges…
> Realistically, this is psyops to say such a thing.
The ultimate psyop is American Thought Control and the literal fact that you refuse to believe humans can entangle and navigate our minds at a distance through our very own consciousness. The CIA Stargate programs (and their many still secret successors) work through this phenomenon.
> The very first questions to answer is why they’d go to the U.S.?
After WII the US was racing ahead with nuclear weapons. They crashed a “kite” to give the US gov something else to ruminate over. In the 80s the US thanked them by striking a small scout craft emerging from the ocean (where some comfortably habitate, just like in Abyss) this fragment bomb warhead took them completely by surprise.
In all of their memories, while having braved the uncertainties of space, they had never ever been attacked before.
One of their oldest leaders from the “nomadic space tribe” which found Earth came to collect the still living crew. America tricked and trapped this one and coerced him “Ion” to do horrible things.
> How did they know that they should go there?
They communicate through entangled consciousness, of which there is an entire secret culture of humans throughout humanity who can also travel among and interact with our thoughts through consciousness. These signs have been evident for thousands of years. It conceals itself in “mysticism” and being indistinguishable from bullshit.
> Were they already observing humans, and if so how are their communications escaping our notice?
Yes, they have been here for approximately 10,000 years, and while they “know all about us” they really don’t “watch” us or take interests in our affairs unless for some reason (like, who wants to nuke us all actually?)
Consciousness is quantum holography and entanglement allows instantaneous communications of entire holographic renderings at any distance. Modern theory is wrong.
Few civilizations would rely on radio propagation beyond a brief period of development. Sooner or later, everyone learns the value of silence.
> They use different physics and electromagnetic spectrum? When you think this way, the next set of questions is why someone would want to convince you of this. What’s the goal?
America has lost control of its own intelligence apparatus, these ops and psyops and counter ops are all between American Thought Control and the unwitting public or instruments of governance necessary in obtaining their own goals.
This isn’t something I read on a blog somewhere, I am actively involved in this drama.
I was “adopted” by the moralist side of a dark conspiracy against our natural destinies. People die over this stuff, our humanity is being mutilated by corrupt interests who thrive in the shadow of incredulity.
That means the less believable something is, the easier it becomes to hide in plain sight.
Did you read my comment on how the whole time travel thing works? One of the few that wasn’t flagged. Read that and tell me about convictions.
I did not make this stuff up, I’m one of the few people in the world who has the audacity and insight to talk about it.
It’s a real shame my most insightful stuff on “thought control” has been flagged (and half a dozen former accounts reduced to negative karma.) Hypocrites.
This observation, which may well play a role in modern battlefield planning is ideological bullshit.
Game theory is a new observation platform, warfare is as old as time.
Warfare is maximum entropy by maximum resolve under maximum attrition.
In warfare matters may begin over one event or claim or idea and end over one completely different.
The dynamics of size and opportunity is non-linear and what may only be the greatest measure of “sides” are those lives remaining who embody such identities. A failed war includes those which succeed while mutilating the humanity they stood for.
Theoretical bullshit is a whetstone for the mind, matters of dead men in objective existential reality often equate to something otherwise. Often otherwises we never collectively come to understand.
This is significant, and I think ironic. I cringed when I read this as the conclusion to that massive military study.
This platform appeals to those who would have it the other way. Those who break the cognitive lazy barrier (like those who break the brute labor inhibitors) are empowered beyond the expectation and conclusions of all others. Those who would be dependent as opposed to those who would own their knowledge and experience internally.
Cognitive effort experienced as unpleasant?
For some I can only imagine sex is unpleasant.
News for you others, or maybe you all for it is not always true that we recognize in ourselves our most prominent qualities.
Without cognition of a thing, the nature or understanding of that thing cannot be one’s own. This applies to everything from your tools through society and civilization itself.
One can only be said to “have” knowledge and experience that one has put one’s self through. One can only be said to “own” that knowledge when one could convincingly recreate those product outcomes from basic essential forms.
Having our challenges accomplished for us is “pleasant” and arguably more “energy efficient”, yet diminish our capacity as competent actors on our own behalf.
I think everyone has experienced those moments when we realize others, fully formed self responsible adults, are by virtue of their technological crutch not fully formed or self responsible.
I’m not sure it is nature this one rails against. Something contrived does settle upon us in suppositions of norms no more natural to us than any of Man’s miscomprehensions.
its an ideology called "xenofeminism" that aims to deconstruct / abolish gender as a construct. Its reinforced by naturalist arguments that say "its just nature" which xenofeminist reject as modern technology enables us to just emanicapte from our gendered bodies. Thats why they argue modern medicine also is "unnaturalistic" when you get a vaccine for example.
Its influenced by postmodern thinkers like Judith Butler and accelerationism.
Mistake is having individual organizations responsible for personal data at all.
An Internic like non profit org or other root certificate type org chain does real world auth using the most edge secure means available. This org issues to private accounts infinite “tokens”, any of which may be used as a hash auth for any level of identification. I) anon yet verified [game platform or gambling site]; II) stable ident (custom config) and verified [tier 1 social media]; III) real ident [passport verified, hotels, travel; IV) premium service credit line validation.
Or something. The individual would be responsible for issuing and revoking the right tokens in relation to public “authorized” services.
Remove the capacity to screw it all up from the middlemen.
