Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rune-space's commentslogin

Compensation is essentially top-of-industry, maybe with the exception of the Big 3 AI companies (that’s assuming you believe their RSU valuations, and that an IPO will occur).

Some projects are OPSEC-restricted, yes.

No massages, classes, laundry.

Many 9-5 people.


> Compensation is essentially top-of-industry

For junior candidates yes. Anyone with 5+ years of good experience, no, it's about half of what you'd make at Google.


For those in the defense industry, Anduril pays pretty well.


I don't doubt it.

Still about half of what a senior role in big tech would amount to.

This is an interesting trend for a bunch of newer companies, pay competitively for junior roles but significantly below industry for experienced candidates.


Classic cult recruitment tactic. Lure people in, hook them, then trap them.


Your claim is that they don't practice at-will employment?


Obviously not? The bigger issue is trusting them not to lord your RSUs over you.


Are you familiar with the term "cult"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult


Sure. Do you have a real argument, or are you just aligned with siblings compliant: "this company sucks: when you stop working for them, they stop paying you"


That's not what the parent said.


You’re talking Google L5? Anduril L5 is similar YOE. I’m seeing ~400k TC for L5 at Google in levels.fyi, Anduril is significantly higher.


If you're using levels.fyi as a reference, Anduril pays its L5s significantly less, not more: https://www.levels.fyi/companies/anduril-industries/salaries...



No, when I say 5 years I mean something like a PhD + five years in a relevant job. That would be maybe L6 at Google unless you're coasting.


Of all the moved goalposts…


[flagged]


And how does that relate to this discussion on relative compensation?


We are talking about senior employees at a R&D heavy company. You brought up Google L5 as the comparison. It is not.

I explicitly mentioned compensation is pretty standard for junior employees.


Alright pal. You haven’t kept a straight line this whole thread (this current message directly contradicts 2x previously established claims of yours). Good day.


> Compensation is essentially top-of-industry, maybe with the exception of the Big 3 AI companies (that’s assuming you believe their RSU valuations, and that an IPO will occur).

I guess it comes down to betting on the IPO then?

The two recent data points I have are from one person who interviewed, got an offer, and his only reaction was “lol, not a chance”. The other person I know who works there now (according to LinkedIn) was a coworker who was cut for underperformance when we worked together years ago. I’ve heard so many different stories about what it’s like that I don’t know what to believe any more.

Calling Anduril comp “significantly higher” than Google does go completely against what I’ve heard from others though. I’ll have to go look again.

EDIT: The levels.fyi data looks great for juniors but definitely isn’t higher than Google for L5+: https://www.levels.fyi/companies/anduril-industries/salaries...


Anduril is a decent base with a huge gamble on equity, Google is a sure shot.

People that started a year ago at Anduril are today making slightly more than they would be had they stared at Google. People that started 2 years ago are making far more than they would be. And it keeps growing – exponentially – from there.


Exponential growth in salary? Wow!

Not realistic…….


2x every year for the past 8+ years. Realistic? Maybe not. Historic? Absolutely.


Take a few runs through sorting a growing deck of cards and anyone will be able to tell you why bubble sort sucks.


But you can’t say:

   thisis:strong:`bold`text

Whereas the equivalent is perfectly fine in markdown.

Falsehoods programmers believe about written language: whitespace is used to separate atomic sequences of runes.


> Falsehoods programmers believe about written language: whitespace is used to separate atomic sequences of runes.

Really? That isn't just untrue of written language in general. It's untrue of every individual written language in specific. You can't even clearly define what an "atomic sequence of glyphs" is.


> You can't even clearly define what an "atomic sequence of glyphs" is.

Kinda. Grapheme cluster breaks are defined in Unicode, but they have all the baggage and edge-cases you'd expect from human languages evolving over time, so they can be encoded in as a few as a thousand rules : https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/tree/main/icu4c/source/da...


Which makes one wonder why REST puts so much weight on them being divided by WS!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: